
28 Jul 2010 by Paul Northup
The Telegraph is today reporting that the Government is saying that ‘Householders face a £300-a-year rise in their gas and electricity bills and significant cuts in how much energy they use if Britain is to “keep the lights on” and meet its climate change targets.’
But this sort of lead coverage isn’t exactly helpful or Generous-spirited. It faces one truth: energy will undoubtedly have to cost more in the future. But it relegates talk about the ways in which households can work to greatly reduce their energy needs and consumption going forward. Something we’re very switched onto here at Generous.
Admittedly, the Telegraph article does go on to talk about the imperative of energy-saving initiatives, but its thrust remains cost. ‘This would make the average family’s annual energy bill of £1,100, £300 more expensive.’
To read more about Energy Secretary Chris Huhne’s 32 separate proposed measures to cut the UK’s carbon emissions by 80 per cent within the next 40 years, click here.
And to join the debate about what sort of mix of energy generation you think fits the Generous ticket, sign in and leave your comments below this story. Tell us what you think.
Flickr photosource – thanks phault
Join the fray by signing in.

Got something to say about this? Log in or sign up to share your comments with us.