Our energy future: costs or savings?

Our energy future: costs or savings?

28 Jul 2010 by Paul Northup

The Telegraph is today reporting that the Government is saying that ‘Householders face a £300-a-year rise in their gas and electricity bills and significant cuts in how much energy they use if Britain is to “keep the lights on” and meet its climate change targets.’

But this sort of lead coverage isn’t exactly helpful or Generous-spirited. It faces one truth: energy will undoubtedly have to cost more in the future. But it relegates talk about the ways in which households can work to greatly reduce their energy needs and consumption going forward. Something we’re very switched onto here at Generous.

Admittedly, the Telegraph article does go on to talk about the imperative of energy-saving initiatives, but its thrust remains cost. ‘This would make the average family’s annual energy bill of £1,100, £300 more expensive.’

To read more about Energy Secretary Chris Huhne’s 32 separate proposed measures to cut the UK’s carbon emissions by 80 per cent within the next 40 years, click here.

And to join the debate about what sort of mix of energy generation you think fits the Generous ticket, sign in and leave your comments below this story. Tell us what you think.

Flickr photosource – thanks phault

Back to news index

Discuss

Latest News

15 years of the National Cycle Network

Sustrans invites you to join the ‘party on the path’ this month as this Saturday marks the 15th anniversary of the National Cycle Network...

See full entry

Latest Blog Entry

Comment icon

Fair-weather generosity?

If you live more than a few tens of degrees north or south of the equator, then the odds are you are Generous by degrees. What I mean is: as the light...

See full entry